理論與數(shù)學物理包括量子場論和基本粒子理論，核物理的基本問題，多體問題和統(tǒng)計物理，非相對論量子力學，引力理論的基本問題。文章報道了理論物理的最新發(fā)展以及相關的數(shù)學問題?！独碚撆c數(shù)學物理》與俄羅斯科學院斯特克洛夫數(shù)學研究所合作出版。同行評審《理論與數(shù)學物理》是一本同行評議期刊。我們使用單盲同行評審格式，在出現(xiàn)問題時使用雙盲或多盲形式。我們的評審團隊包括來自多個國家(意大利、巴西、英國、法國、美國等)的270多名國內外評審人員(83%)。2017年從提交到首次評審的平均周期為3天，從首次評審到驗收的平均周期為80天。2017年投稿退稿率為48%。接受發(fā)表文章的最終決定由編輯委員會作出。被邀請的審稿人因利益沖突，認為不符合審稿條件或者不能審稿的，應當及時通知審稿人，并予以拒絕。審稿人應以一種合理合理的方式清晰地闡述自己的觀點，這樣作者才能利用審稿人的觀點來完善稿件。必須避免對作者的個人批評。評論者應該顯示發(fā)表的一篇評論(我)任何相關的工作沒有被引用的作者,(2)任何已報道在以前的出版物和沒有適當?shù)膮⒖蓟蛞?(2)任何實質性相似或重疊與其他手稿(發(fā)表或未發(fā)表)的個人知識。

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics covers quantum field theory and theory of elementary particles, fundamental problems of nuclear physics, many-body problems and statistical physics, nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, and basic problems of gravitation theory. Articles report on current developments in theoretical physics as well as related mathematical problems. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics is published in collaboration with the Steklov Mathematical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences.PEER REVIEWTheoretical and Mathematical Physics is a peer reviewed journal. We use a single blind peer review format, double or more blind in cases of problems. Our team of reviewers includes over 270 reviewers, both internal and external (83%), from many countries (Italy, Brazil, UK, France, USA, etc.). The average period from submission to first decision in 2017 was 3 days, and that from first decision to acceptance was 80 days. The rejection rate for submitted manuscripts in 2017 was 48%. The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Editorial Board.Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (ii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.